Free Hamlet Essays: Hamlet Interpreted :: The Tragedy of Hamlet Essays

village Interpreted It is clear Hamlet can be interpreted from a multitude of perspectives on numerous levels. I cannot quite grasp Mr. Blooms contention that this is a work of near biblical immensity nor can I accept his allusions to Jesus or the Buddha. Hamlet form apart something transcendent about him places him more aptly with the biblical male monarch David, or with even more exalted scriptural figures.(Bloom, 384). My immediate repartee is that when Mr. Bloom shuffles off this mortal coil, I dont believe Billy Shakespeare go away be waiting with a pint of ale. Professor Schechners enjoyable output signal increased my appreciation of the value of wardrobe and inflection of voice. Prior to this exploit I did not pull in Polonius as a buffoon (as depicted by Mr. Shapli), nor the incestuous nature of Ophelias familial relationships (Ms. Coles ability to transform from squeeze to lunatic was shocking). Doubtless there are near as numerous interpretations of Hamlet as t here are Shakespearean aficionados. My feature expertness lies in the political arena. I believe Hamlet could be construed as a treatise on aggressive, imperialist behavior. Throughout the Dramaturgic Analysis of Hamlet Prince of Denmark the indecisiveness of Hamlet is noted. He does not immediately seek revenge but continually schemes, rants and raves (both in his rational and insane moments). Whether cowardice, caution, or patently indifference dominate his persona is unclear - what is clear is his distaste for his own behavior How stand I then, That have a father killd, a mother staind,...And let all sleep, while to my shame I see The imminent death of twenty dollar bill thousand men... (sic). (Shakespeare, 116). The impending doom of the twenty thousand men alludes to a campaign waged by Fortinbas, the Prince of Norway. Though the playing area is said to be of little value, Fortinbas is warring on principles of honor and the concomitant expansion of Norway. An enraged Ham let mistakenly slays Polonius. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are sent to their unimportant deaths only when he is inspired by pirates to save his own life. These murders touch no elaborate schemes but were simply enacted. Yet with all his planning, his opportunities, his justification, wherefore can he not kill Claudius? The portrayal of the pirates as benevolent thieves (Shakespeare, 124) and the fact that warlike Fortinbras succeeds in Poland and obtains the Kingdom of Denmark by plays end - whitethorn be a commentary on decisive, imperialistic behavior.